Friday, November 15, 2013

The Reaganish Sarah Palin—Part 1

In an appearance on the Today show to promote her new book "Good Tidings," Sarah Palin said, "There is no Ronald Reagan on the scene today."  I disagree. There is and that person is Sarah Palin.  In part one of this segment, I demonstrate that there is no other politician that is as "Reaganish" as Sarah Palin.  The similarities between the two run the gamut from the political to the professional to the personal.  There is no other conservative figure since Ronald Reagan who withstood irrational attacks and ridicule from the media and the left like Sarah Palin.

The Reaganish Sarah Palin—Part 2

In an appearance on the Today show to promote her new book "Good Tidings," Sarah Palin said, "There is no Ronald Reagan on the scene today."  I disagree. There is and it is Sarah Palin.  In part two of this segment, Sarah Palin has an enthusiastic, motivated and passionate group of supporters behind her as Ronald Reagan did.  It's back to the future with the GOP.  As it was in 1973 as it is in 2013, not much has changed with the republican establishment.  They are still the gang that can't shoot straight.  They still alienate their base of voters. They still strive to be Democrat light. They still disrespect and distance themselves from conservatives like Sarah Palin as they did to Reagan.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

The Obama Legacy: From Hope & Change to Lie & Blame

The Obama legacy will be defined as one that transformed from hope and change to lies and blame.  Is Barack Obama capable of telling the truth about anything?  From issues such as the killing Osama Bin Laden to Obamacare, there are lies found in all of them.  Obama's lie "you can keep your insurance or doctor" will do for his legacy what "Read my lips—no new taxes" and "I didn't have sex with that woman" did for the legacies of George HW Bush and Bill Clinton. The Democrats are frantically doing damage control for Hillary Clinton after 60 Minutes piece on Benghazi.  The Democrat party girls who claim that embassy attacks under previous administrations are the same as Benghazi are wrong.  Unlike Benghazi: The previous attacks were sudden suicide bombings that came without any warning. The previous attacks did not happen on the anniversary of a major attack like 9/11/2001. The previous attacks did not include Pres Bush or Condi Rice ordering John Bolton to go on Sunday morning talk shows to blame the attacks on a video. The previous attacks did not last 7 hours where an ambassador was raped and then killed, resulting in the first high level diplomat killed since the Jimmy Carter years. To the "what difference does it make" hens in the Democrat party who continue to defend the indefensible I ask—how do you sleep at night?